Detachment and compensation: Groundwork for a metaphysics of ‘biosocial becoming’
dc.contributor.author | Moss, Lenny | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-22T15:28:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01-07 | |
dc.description.abstract | There are many in the social sciences and social philosophy who would aspire to overcome the ‘nature/culture binary’, including some who, with at least an implicit nod toward a putatively ‘antiessentialist’ process ontology, have set out with an orientation toward a paradigm of ‘biosocial becoming’ (Ingold and Palsson, 2013). Such contemporary work, however, in areas such as social and cultural anthropology and sciences studies has often failed to clarify, let alone justify, the warrants of their most basic assumptions and assertions. In what follows, adumbrations will be offered for a comprehensive metaphysics of ‘biosocial becoming’ that can stand accountable both to empirical/descriptive and to normative claims. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 40, No 1, pp. 91–105 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0191453713513787 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/16964 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | SAGE | en_GB |
dc.subject | autopoiesis | en_GB |
dc.subject | Robert Brandom | en_GB |
dc.subject | detachment | en_GB |
dc.subject | Martin Heidigger | en_GB |
dc.subject | superorganism | en_GB |
dc.subject | Lev Vygotsky | en_GB |
dc.title | Detachment and compensation: Groundwork for a metaphysics of ‘biosocial becoming’ | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-22T15:28:33Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0191-4537 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Philosophy and Social Criticism | en_GB |
refterms.dateFOA | 2025-01-24T19:01:03Z |