Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoss, Lenny
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-22T15:28:33Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-07
dc.description.abstractThere are many in the social sciences and social philosophy who would aspire to overcome the ‘nature/culture binary’, including some who, with at least an implicit nod toward a putatively ‘antiessentialist’ process ontology, have set out with an orientation toward a paradigm of ‘biosocial becoming’ (Ingold and Palsson, 2013). Such contemporary work, however, in areas such as social and cultural anthropology and sciences studies has often failed to clarify, let alone justify, the warrants of their most basic assumptions and assertions. In what follows, adumbrations will be offered for a comprehensive metaphysics of ‘biosocial becoming’ that can stand accountable both to empirical/descriptive and to normative claims.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 40, No 1, pp. 91–105en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0191453713513787
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16964
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGEen_GB
dc.subjectautopoiesisen_GB
dc.subjectRobert Brandomen_GB
dc.subjectdetachmenten_GB
dc.subjectMartin Heidiggeren_GB
dc.subjectsuperorganismen_GB
dc.subjectLev Vygotskyen_GB
dc.titleDetachment and compensation: Groundwork for a metaphysics of ‘biosocial becoming’en_GB
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.available2015-04-22T15:28:33Z
dc.identifier.issn0191-4537
dc.identifier.journalPhilosophy and Social Criticismen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2025-01-24T19:01:03Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record