Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJames, O
dc.contributor.authorPetrovsky, N
dc.contributor.authorMoseley, A
dc.contributor.authorBoyne, G
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-11T13:48:43Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-20
dc.description.abstractThis article extends the theory of government agency survival from separation of powers to parliamentary government systems. It evaluates expectations of increased risk to agencies following transitions in government, prime minister or departmental minister, and from incongruence between the originally establishing and currently overseeing political executive. Using survival models for UK executive agencies between 1989 and 2012, the study finds that politics trumps performance. Ministers seek to make their mark by terminating agencies created by previous ministers, which is reinforced by high media attention to the agency. Performance against agency targets is not associated with higher termination risk, and replacement agencies do not perform any better than those that were terminated. Financial autonomy provides some protection for agencies that are less dependent on budgetary appropriations.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0007123414000477
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/17500
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0007123414000477en_GB
dc.subjectAgenciesen_GB
dc.subjectOrganisation structuralen_GB
dc.subjectGovernment agenciesen_GB
dc.titleThe Politics of Agency Death: Ministers and the Survival of Government Agencies in a Parliamentary Systemen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-06-11T13:48:43Z
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of Political Scienceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record