Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeonelli, Sabina
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-17T10:44:07Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes an account of scientific data that makes sense of recent debates on data-driven and 'big data' research, while also building on the history of data production and use particularly within biology. In this view, 'data' is a relational category applied to research outputs that are taken, at specific moments of inquiry, to provide evidence for knowledge claims of interest to the researchers involved. They do not have truth-value in and of themselves, nor can they be seen as straightforward representations of given phenomena. Rather, they are fungible objects defined by their portability and prospective usefulness as evidence.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMax Planck Institute for the History of Science (project “Sciences of the Archive”)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophy of Science, 2015, Vol. 82, No. 5, pp. 810-821
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/684083
dc.identifier.grantnumber335925
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/17586
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Chicago Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/journals/journal/phos.htmlen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher's policy
dc.rightsCopyright 2015 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.
dc.titleWhat Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Frameworken_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0031-8248
dc.identifier.journalPhilosophy of Science: official journal of the Philosophy of Science Associationen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record