Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTreat, CC
dc.contributor.authorJones, MC
dc.contributor.authorCamill, P
dc.contributor.authorGallego-Sala, AV
dc.contributor.authorGarneau, M
dc.contributor.authorHarden, JW
dc.contributor.authorHugelius, G
dc.contributor.authorKlein, ES
dc.contributor.authorKokfelt, U
dc.contributor.authorKuhry, P
dc.contributor.authorLoisel, J
dc.contributor.authorMathijssen, PJH
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, JA
dc.contributor.authorOksanen, PO
dc.contributor.authorRonkainen, TM
dc.contributor.authorSannel, ABK
dc.contributor.authorTalbot, J
dc.contributor.authorTarnocai, CM
dc.contributor.authorValiranta, M
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-14T16:37:38Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-12
dc.description.abstractPermafrost dynamics play an important role in high-latitude peatland carbon balance and are key to understanding the future response of soil carbon stocks. Permafrost aggradation can control the magnitude of the carbon feedback in peatlands through effects on peat properties. We compiled peatland plant macrofossil records for the northern permafrost zone (515 cores from 280 sites) and classified samples by vegetation type and environmental class (fen, bog, tundra and boreal permafrost, thawed permafrost). We examined differences in peat properties (bulk density, carbon (C), nitrogen (N) and organic matter content, C/N ratio) and C accumulation rates among vegetation types and environmental classes. Consequences of permafrost aggradation differed between boreal and tundra biomes, including differences in vegetation composition, C/N ratios, and N content. The vegetation composition of tundra permafrost peatlands was similar to permafrost-free fens, while boreal permafrost peatlands more closely resembled permafrost-free bogs. Nitrogen content in boreal permafrost and thawed permafrost peatlands was significantly lower than in permafrost-free bogs despite similar vegetation types (0.9% versus 1.5% N). Median long-term C accumulation rates were higher in fens (23 g C m-2 y-1) than in permafrost-free bogs (18 g C m-2 y-1), and were lowest in boreal permafrost peatlands (14 g C m-2 y-1). The plant macrofossil record demonstrated transitions from fens to bogs to permafrost peatlands, bogs to fens, permafrost aggradation within fens, and permafrost thaw and re-aggradation. Using data synthesis, we've identified predominant peatland successional pathways, changes in vegetation type, peat properties, and C accumulation rates associated with permafrost aggradation.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUSGS Climate and Land-useChange Research and Development Programen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAcademy of Finlanden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Swedish Academy of Scienceen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipYmer-80, Knut & Alice Wallenberg and Ahlmann Foundationsen_GB
dc.identifier.citationdoi:10.1002/2015JG003061.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/2015JG003061
dc.identifier.grantnumberARC-1304823en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber131409en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber1140900en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberDEB 598 0092704en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/18981
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU) / Wileyen_GB
dc.relation.sourceAll data for this paper are properly cited in Supplemental Table 1. Additionally, data can be accessed following registration from the International Soil Carbon Network (http://iscn.fluxdata.org/Pages/default.aspx; DOI pending).en_GB
dc.subjectpeatlanden_GB
dc.subjectplant macrofossilen_GB
dc.subjectpermafrosten_GB
dc.subjectsoil propertiesen_GB
dc.subjectcarbon cyclingen_GB
dc.subjectpaeoecologyen_GB
dc.titleEffects of permafrost aggradation on peat properties as determined from a pan-arctic synthesis of plant macrofossilsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-12-14T16:37:38Z
dc.identifier.issn1810-6285
exeter.article-number2015JG003061RR
dc.description©2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.en_GB
dc.descriptionThis article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1002/2015JG003061en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciencesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record