Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIaryczower, Matias
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Gabriel
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-18T15:32:27Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-19
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we study the conditions under which members of Congress incorporate policy-specific information in their voting decisions. To do this, we estimate an empirical model that accounts for uncertainty and private information about the quality of the proposal. We show that seniority and uncompetitive elections lead to higher ideological rigidity, and curtail the role of information in policy-making. These findings provide a rationale in favor of reforms aimed at increasing actual and potential renewal of the membership.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 28 (1), pp. 79–104en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ecpo.12072
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/19293
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policyen_GB
dc.titleWhat does it take for Congress to enact good policies? Policy-specific information and roll-call voting in the U.S. Congressen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.typeWorking Paperen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0954-1985
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1468-0343
dc.identifier.journalEconomics & Politicsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record