Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDixon, Laura E.
dc.contributor.authorHodge, Sarah K.
dc.contributor.authorvan Ooijen, Gerben
dc.contributor.authorTroein, Carl
dc.contributor.authorAkman, Ozgur E.
dc.contributor.authorMillar, Andrew J.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-09T11:46:54Z
dc.date.issued2014-07
dc.description.abstractThe circadian clock measures time across a 24 h period, increasing fitness by phasing biological processes to the most appropriate time of day. The interlocking feedback loop mechanism of the clock is conserved across species; however, the number of loops varies. Mathematical and computational analyses have suggested that loop complexity affects the overall flexibility of the oscillator, including its responses to entrainment signals. We used a discriminating experimental assay, at the transition between different photoperiods, in order to test this proposal in a minimal circadian network (in Ostreococcus tauri) and a more complex network (in Arabidopsis thaliana). Transcriptional and translational reporters in O. tauri primarily tracked dawn or dusk, whereas in A. thaliana, a wider range of responses were observed, consistent with its more flexible clock. Model analysis supported the requirement for this diversity of responses among the components of the more complex network. However, these and earlier data showed that the O. tauri network retains surprising flexibility, despite its simple circuit. We found that models constructed from experimental data can show flexibility either from multiple loops and/or from multiple light inputs. Our results suggest that O. tauri has adopted the latter strategy, possibly as a consequence of genomic reduction.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by EU FP7 collaborative project TiMet (award 245143), BBSRC and EPSRC awards BB/F005237/1, BB/D019621/1 and BB/J009423 (to A.J.M. and others) and EPSRC award EP/I017445/1 (to O.E.A. and others). C.T.'s work was supported by the Human Frontiers Science Program and the Swedish Research Council (award 2010-5219).en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 203, pp. 568 - 577en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nph.12853
dc.identifier.grantnumberBB/F005237/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberBB/D019621/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberBB/J009423en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/I017445/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/19668
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24842166en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.12853/fullen_GB
dc.rights© 2014 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2014 New Phytologist Trust This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectbiological clocksen_GB
dc.subjectflexibilityen_GB
dc.subjectmarine algaeen_GB
dc.subjectmathematical analysisen_GB
dc.subjectnonlinear dynamicsen_GB
dc.subjectphotoperioden_GB
dc.subjectsystems biologyen_GB
dc.subjectArabidopsisen_GB
dc.subjectChlorophytaen_GB
dc.subjectCircadian Clocksen_GB
dc.subjectFeedback, Physiologicalen_GB
dc.subjectGene Expression Regulation, Planten_GB
dc.subjectLighten_GB
dc.subjectModels, Biologicalen_GB
dc.subjectPhotoperioden_GB
dc.subjectPlant Proteinsen_GB
dc.titleLight and circadian regulation of clock components aids flexible responses to environmental signalsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-02-09T11:46:54Z
dc.identifier.issn0028-646X
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionJournal Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1469-8137
dc.identifier.journalNew Phytologisten_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record