Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFisusi, Funmilola A.
dc.contributor.authorSiew, Adeline
dc.contributor.authorChooi, Kar Wai
dc.contributor.authorOkubanjo, Omotunde
dc.contributor.authorGarrett, Natalie
dc.contributor.authorLalatsa, Katerina
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Dolores R.
dc.contributor.authorSummers, I.R.
dc.contributor.authorMoger, Julian
dc.contributor.authorStapleton, Paul
dc.contributor.authorSatchi-Fainaro, Ronit
dc.contributor.authorSchätzlein, Andreas G.
dc.contributor.authorUchegbu, Ijeoma F.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-17T13:47:48Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-22
dc.description.abstractPurpose The blood brain barrier compromises glioblastoma chemotherapy. However high blood concentrations of lipophilic, alkylating drugs result in brain uptake, but cause myelosuppression. We hypothesised that nanoparticles could achieve therapeutic brain concentrations without dose-limiting myelosuppression. Methods Mice were dosed with either intravenous lomustine Molecular Envelope Technology (MET) nanoparticles (13 mg kg-1) or ethanolic lomustine (6.5 mg kg-1) and tissues analysed. Efficacy was assessed in an orthotopic U-87 MG glioblastoma model, following intravenous MET lomustine (daily 13 mg kg-1) or ethanolic lomustine (daily 1.2 mg kg-1 - the highest repeated dose possible). Myelosuppression and MET particle macrophage uptake were also investigated. Results The MET formulation resulted in modest brain targeting (brain/ bone AUC0-4h ratios for MET and ethanolic lomustine = 0.90 and 0.53 respectively and brain/ liver AUC0-4h ratios for MET and ethanolic lomustine = 0.24 and 0.15 respectively). The MET formulation significantly increased mice (U-87 MG tumours) survival times; with MET lomustine, ethanolic lomustine and untreated mean survival times of 33.2, 22.5 and 21.3 days respectively and there were no material treatment-related differences in blood and femoral cell counts. Macrophage uptake is slower for MET nanoparticles than for liposomes. Conclusions Particulate drug formulations improved brain tumour therapy without major bone marrow toxicity.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipTertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund, formerly Education Trust Fund), Nigeriaen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipObafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeriaen_GB
dc.identifier.citationFirst online: 22 February 2016en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11095-016-1872-x
dc.identifier.grantnumber083944/Z/07/Zen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberAcademic Staff Training and Development Granten_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/19920
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists / Springer Verlagen_GB
dc.rightsThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists via the DOI in this record.
dc.subjectGlioblastoma multiformeen_GB
dc.subjectMolecular Envelope Technology (MET)en_GB
dc.subjectLomustineen_GB
dc.subjectMyelosuppressionen_GB
dc.subjectNanoparticlesen_GB
dc.titleLomustine Nanoparticles Enable Both Bone Marrow Sparing and High Brain Drug Levels – A Strategy for Brain Cancer Treatmentsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0724-8741
dc.descriptionThis is an open access article. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-016-1872-x.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1573-904X
dc.identifier.journalPharmaceutical Researchen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record