Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchenck, Tine
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-13T09:08:40Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-24
dc.description.abstractThis thesis concerns the relationship between research in experimental archaeology and the intangible of the past. Only a quarter of technological experiments in a sample of 100 studies addresses the intangible of technological practice, and this project sets out to explore if there are conceptual or practical obstacles for this low rate. The thesis begins with an in-depth examination of experimental archaeology and the criteria, paradigms and theories that determine its practice. Through this study, elements of the dichotomy positivism//postmodernism are uncovered and discussed. To resolve this dualism, a third paradigm – philosophical pragmatism – is introduced as an alternative. This conceptual debate represents Part I, and is subsequently collated into a methodological framework for the creation of a typified experiment. Part II consists of the experimental segment of this study, in search for practical obstacles for the exploration of the intangible. Through experimenting with Iron Age Bucket-shaped pots, Mesolithic faceted pebbles and Middle Palaeolithic birch bark tar production, different components of an experiment are highlighted for investigation. An element that comes forward as problematic is the relationship between experimental archaeologists and science ideals that is underscored by experimental tradition. Conclusively, the final discussion leaves the conceptual and practical barriers that may prevent archaeologists from studying the intangible aspects of technology overturned. In sum, this may enable experimental archaeologists to take a fuller view of their own practice and that of the people of the past.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2032en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/22018
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublicationen_GB
dc.rightsCreative Commons Licence Accessing intangible technologies through experimental archaeology. A methodological analysis by Tine Schenck is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.en_GB
dc.subjectExperimental Archaeologyen_GB
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Scienceen_GB
dc.subjectAncient Technologyen_GB
dc.subjectEpistemology of Archaeologyen_GB
dc.subjectArchaeological Theoryen_GB
dc.subjectIntangible Practicesen_GB
dc.subjectBurcket-Shaped Potsen_GB
dc.subjectMesolithic Pebble Toolsen_GB
dc.subjectMousterian Birch Bark Tar Productionen_GB
dc.titleAccessing intangible technologies through experimental archaeology. A methodological analysisen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.contributor.advisorOutram, Alan
dc.contributor.advisorBradley, Bruce
dc.publisher.departmentArchaeologyen_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Archaeologyen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record