Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTripathi, OP
dc.contributor.authorBaldwin, M
dc.contributor.authorCharlton-Perez, A
dc.contributor.authorCharron, M
dc.contributor.authorCheung, JCH
dc.contributor.authorEckermann, SD
dc.contributor.authorGerber, E
dc.contributor.authorJackson, DR
dc.contributor.authorKuroda, Y
dc.contributor.authorLang, A
dc.contributor.authorMclay, J
dc.contributor.authorMizuta, R
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, C
dc.contributor.authorRoff, G
dc.contributor.authorSigmond, M
dc.contributor.authorSon, S-W
dc.contributor.authorStockdale, T
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-19T12:58:17Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-28
dc.description.abstractThe first multimodel study to estimate the predictability of a boreal sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) is performed using five NWP systems. During the 2012/13 boreal winter, anomalous upward propagating planetary wave activity was observed toward the end of December, which was followed by a rapid deceleration of the westerly circulation around 2 January 2013, and on 7 January 2013 the zonal-mean zonal wind at 60°N and 10 hPa reversed to easterly. This stratospheric dynamical activity was followed by an equatorward shift of the tropospheric jet stream and by a high pressure anomaly over the North Atlantic, which resulted in severe cold conditions in the United Kingdom and northern Europe. In most of the five models, the SSW event was predicted 10 days in advance. However, only some ensemble members in most of the models predicted weakening of westerly wind when the models were initialized 15 days in advance of the SSW. Further dynamical analysis of the SSW shows that this event was characterized by the anomalous planetary wavenumber-1 amplification followed by the anomalous wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere, which resulted in a split vortex occurring between 6 and 8 January 2013. The models have some success in reproducing wavenumber-1 activity when initialized 15 days in advance, but they generally failed to produce the wavenumber-2 activity during the final days of the event. Detailed analysis shows that models have reasonably good skill in forecasting tropospheric blocking features that stimulate wavenumber-2 amplification in the troposphere, but they have limited skill in reproducing wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Stratospheric Network for the Assessment of Predictability (SNAP) is supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) (Grant H5147600) and partially supported by the SPARC.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationMonthly Weather Review, 2016, Volume 144, pp.1935-1960en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1175/MWR-D-15-0010.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/22632
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Societyen_GB
dc.rightsThis is the final version of the article. Available from the American Meteorological Society via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.titleExamining the predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 using multiple NWP systemsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-07-19T12:58:17Z
dc.identifier.issn0027-0644
dc.identifier.journalMonthly Weather Reviewen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record