Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGlackin, SN
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-26T15:38:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-23
dc.description.abstractAnne Barnhill and Franklin Miller dispute my claim that the prescriptions of placebo treatments to patients are not typically deceptive, and do not typically violate the patients' informed consent. However, Barnhill and Miller seriously mischaracterise my position in two ways, as well as failing to show that the procedure I discuss requires a physician to act wrongfully in deceiving her patient. Accordingly, I find their argument unpersuasive.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/medethics-2015-103082
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/22733
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27340240en_GB
dc.rightsThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from BMJ via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.subjectApplied and Professional Ethicsen_GB
dc.subjectEthicsen_GB
dc.subjectInformed Consenten_GB
dc.subjectPaternalismen_GB
dc.subjectTruth Disclosureen_GB
dc.titleParsing placebo treatments: a response to Barnhill and Miller.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-07-26T15:38:02Z
dc.identifier.issn0306-6800
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Medical Ethicsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record