Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work
Public Understanding of Science
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final version of the article is available via the DOI in this record.
This paper explores the phenomena of public scientific debates, where scientific controversies are argued out in public fora such as the mass media, using the case of popular evolutionary psychology in the UK of the 1990s. An earlier quantitative analysis of the UK press coverage of the subject (Cassidy, 2005) suggested that academics associated with evolutionary psychology had been unusually active in the media at that time, particularly in association with the publication of popular science books on the subject. Previous research by Turner, by Gieryn, and by Bucchi has established the relationship between such appeals to the public domain and the establishment of scientific legitimacy and academic disciplinary boundaries. Following this work, I argue here that popular science has, in this case, provided a creative space for scientists, outside of the constraints of ordinary academic discourse, allowing them to reach across scientific boundaries in order to claim expertise in the study of human beings. © SAGE Publications.
The research leading up to this paper was supported by studentships from the ESRC held at the University of Edinburgh, while the writing of this paper was supported by an ESRC Postdoctoral Fellowship held at the University of Manchester.
Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 175-205