Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPhillips, NE
dc.contributor.authorManning, CS
dc.contributor.authorPettini, T
dc.contributor.authorBiga, V
dc.contributor.authorMarinopoulou, E
dc.contributor.authorStanley, P
dc.contributor.authorBoyd, J
dc.contributor.authorBagnall, J
dc.contributor.authorPaszek, P
dc.contributor.authorSpiller, DG
dc.contributor.authorWhite, MRH
dc.contributor.authorGoodfellow, M
dc.contributor.authorGalla, T
dc.contributor.authorRattray, M
dc.contributor.authorPapalopulu, N
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-06T11:24:53Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractRecent studies suggest that cells make stochastic choices with respect to differentiation or division. However, the molecular mechanism underlying such stochasticity is unknown. We previously proposed that the timing of vertebrate neuronal differentiation is regulated by molecular oscillations of a transcriptional repressor, HES1, tuned by a posttranscriptional repressor, miR-9. Here, we computationally model the effects of intrinsic noise on the Hes1/miR-9 oscillator as a consequence of low molecular numbers of interacting species, determined experimentally. We report that increased stochasticity spreads the timing of differentiation in a population, such that initially equivalent cells differentiate over a period of time. Surprisingly, inherent stochasticity also increases the robustness of the progenitor state and lessens the impact of unequal, random distribution of molecules at cell division on the temporal spread of differentiation at the population level. This advantageous use of biological noise contrasts with the view that noise needs to be counteracted.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship to NP (090868/Z/09/Z), a Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship to CM (103986/Z/14/Z), a Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Award (097820/Z/11/B) and a BBSRC Doctoral Training Centre in Systems Biology studentship to NEP. PP holds a BBSRC David Phillips Research Fellowship (BB/I017976/1). MG gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the EPSRC via grant EP/N014391/1. The contribution of MG was generously supported by a Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Award (WT105618MA). J Boyd was funded by MRC grant MR/K015885/1. DS and MW’s work is funded by an MRC grant MR/K015885/1 and a BBSRC grant BB/K003097/1. The authors would also like to thank the Biological Services Facility (BSF), the Bioimaging and Flow Cytometry Facilities of the Computational and Systems Biology Developmental Biology and Stem Cells University of Manchester for technical support, in particular to Dr Gareth Howell for expert advice on challenging FACS sorts. We thank Dr. Ximena Soto for advice and discussions and Dr Angelica Santiago-Gomez from Robert B Clarke’s group at the MCRC, Manchester for technical support and advice with western blotting. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation2016;5: e16118. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.16118en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.7554/eLife.16118
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/23785
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publishereLife Sciences Publicationsen_GB
dc.rightsCopyright Phillips et al. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.titleStochasticity in the miR-9/Hes1 oscillatory network can account for clonal heterogeneity in the timing of differentiationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-10-06T11:24:53Z
dc.identifier.issn2050-084X
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journaleLifeen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record