Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaele, SJ
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-15T15:45:13Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-21
dc.description.abstractLone-actor terrorists are very often presented as emotionally and/or cognitively impaired—yet is it really the case? The present article provides the first rigorous assessment of the hypotheses according to which a high level of negative emotions, especially anger, and a lack of cognitive flexibility and complexity play a role in lone-actor terrorists’ violent actions. Using a sample of lone-actor terrorists’ writings, we use the LIWC (a fully automated language use analysis software) to compare terrorists’ cognition and emotion with those of other control groups, most notably nonviolent radical activists. Results strongly support the first hypothesis but clearly refute the second one, suggesting that lone-actor terrorists are in fact characterized by a specific combination of high-anger and high-cognitive complexity. These method and results lay the groundwork for a more systematic and nuanced analysis of the psychology of terrorists, which is currently in a deadlock.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 38 (3), pp. 449-468en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/pops.12365
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/24439
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2016 International Society of Political Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleLone-actor Terrorists’ Emotions and Cognition: An Evaluation beyond Stereotypesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1467-9221
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.
dc.identifier.eissn1467-9221
dc.identifier.journalPolitical Psychologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record