Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrichard, A
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-24T13:32:56Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-03
dc.description.abstractIn this article I argue that the contemporary normative analysis of EU foreign policy is predominantly Kantian. This, I argue, is highly problematic, because at the heart of Kantian and neo-Kanitan accounts of ethics is a moral universalism that ought not to animate EU foreign policy unless that foreign policy desires to be neo-colonial. I set out why this is the case by developing an account of ethics derived from the writings of Alasdair MacIntyre. MacIntyre’s account of ethics is both critical of Kantian universalism and provides a constructive alternative for evaluating moral behaviour and I use both sets of insights to evaluate neo-Kantianism in EU studies and liberal universalism as a suitable foundation for an ethical foreign policy of the EU.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 21 (3), pp. 413 - 429en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14782804.2013.831604
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/27679
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en_GB
dc.subjectjusticeen_GB
dc.subjectMacIntyreen_GB
dc.subjectneo-Aristotelianismen_GB
dc.subjectethicsen_GB
dc.subjectEU foreign policyen_GB
dc.subjectNormative Power Europeen_GB
dc.titleJustice and EU Foreign Policyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2017-05-24T13:32:56Z
dc.identifier.issn1478-2804
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Contemporary European Studiesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record