Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPlayford, CJ
dc.contributor.authorGayle, V
dc.contributor.authorConnelly, R
dc.contributor.authorMurray, S
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-22T12:54:55Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-16
dc.description.abstractIn Britain there have been manifest changes in the management and organisation of education, but despite these developments there are still persistent inequalities in pupils’ educational outcomes. These inequalities are consequential because school qualifications are known to influence both pupils’ immediate continuation in education, and their later educational and occupational outcomes. The Scottish school system is similar to the system in England and Wales but there are a distinctive set of qualifications. From the mid-1980s until 2013 the final years of compulsory schooling led up to Standard Grade qualifications. Standard Grades were similar to the General Certificates of Secondary Education (GCSEs) and are worthy of detailed sociological examination because they were the first major branching point in the Scottish education system. A specialist dataset using administrative records was constructed for this project. The dataset comprises young people who undertook Standard Grades in Scottish schools between 2007 and 2011, who were members of the Scottish Longitudinal Study (SLS). We analyse pupils’ subject-area outcomes using a latent variable modelling approach, and explore characteristics associated with the membership of latent educational groups. The analyses uncovered four main latent educational groups. One group had very positive outcomes and pupils were generally more socially advantaged; another group had very poor outcomes and were generally more socially disadvantaged. There were two ‘middle’ groups, which both had similar moderate overall Standard Grade outcomes, but notably different subject-area-level outcomes. We conclude that during school hours these pupils are unlikely to be found drinking Iron Brew WKD in their local parks or at home playing on their Xbox; however, they are also unlikely to be filling out university application forms in the next couple of years.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWe gratefully thank and acknowledge the support provided by staff of the Longitudinal Studies Centre – Scotland (LSCS). The LSCS is supported by the ESRC/JISC, the Scottish Funding Council, the Chief Scientist’s Office and the Scottish Government. The authors alone are responsible for the interpretation of the data. Census output is Crown copyright and is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen’s Printer for Scotland. We would also like to thank the audiences at the Social Stratification Conference (Milan), the Society for Life Course and Longitudinal Studies Conference (Dublin), and the Employment Research Institute, Edinburgh Napier University for their helpful comments on presentations related to this analysis. We would also like to thank Professor Chris Dibben and colleagues at the Administrative Data Research Centre – Scotland.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 11, Iss. 2 - 3, pp. 183 - 202en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21582041.2016.1172728
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/28139
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en_GB
dc.rights© 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectEducationen_GB
dc.subjectinequalityen_GB
dc.subjectsocial stratificationen_GB
dc.subjectlatent class analysisen_GB
dc.subjectScotlanden_GB
dc.titleParental socioeconomic influences on filial educational outcomes in Scotland: patterns of school-level educational performance using administrative dataen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn2158-2041
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2158-205X
dc.identifier.journalContemporary Social Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.