dc.contributor.author | Kroger, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-04T10:38:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-11-20 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article links the literature on the Europeanization of civil society organizations (CSOs) with the literature on the contribution CSOs can make to democracy in the EU. To do so, it asks which are the pull factors that support CSOs’ Europeanization: are they mostly strategic and linked to where law-making and the money are? Or are they likewise linked to a desire to contribute to EU democracy? To explore this question, the article looks at agricultural, environmental and anti-poverty groups and combines fresh qualitative with quantitative data. The findings suggest that we need to distinguish strategic Europeanization, on the one hand, from the identification with supranational democracy, on the other. They also show that the most Europeanized organizations need not be the most interested in EU democracy, whereas organizations with a comparatively low degree of Europeanization can still be interested in EU democracy. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 20 November 2017 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17448689.2017.1401764 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/29176 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | |
dc.title | Strategic or principled? The engagement of civil society organisations with the EU | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1744-8689 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Civil Society | en_GB |