Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHouslay, T
dc.contributor.authorVierbuchen, M
dc.contributor.authorGrimmer, AJ
dc.contributor.authorYoung, AJ
dc.contributor.authorWilson, A
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-20T10:25:22Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-24
dc.description.abstract1. Within-populations, individuals can vary in stress response, a multivariate phenomenon comprising neuroendocrine, physiological and behavioural traits. 2. Verbal models of individual stress ‘coping style’ have proposed that the behavioural component of this variation can be described as a single axis, with each individual’s coping style being consistent across time and stress contexts. 3. Focusing on this behavioural component of stress response, and combining repeated measures of multiple traits with a novel multivariate modelling framework, we test for the existence of coping style variation and assess its stability across contexts in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). 4. Specifically, we test the following hypotheses: (i) there exists repeatable among-individual behavioural (co)variation (‘personality’) within a mild stress context consistent with a risk-averse—risk-prone continuum of behavioural coping style, (ii) there is population-level plasticity in behaviour as a function of stressor severity, (iii) there is among-individual variation in plasticity (i.e., IxE), and (iv) the presence of IxE reduces cross-context stability of behavioural coping style. 5. We found significant repeatable among-individual behavioural (co)variation in the mild stress context (open field trial), represented as an I matrix. However, I was not readily described by a simple risk-averse—risk-prone continuum as posited by the original coping style model. We also found strong evidence for population-level changes in mean behaviour with increasing stressor severity (simulated avian and piscine predation risks). 6. Single-trait analyses did show the presence of individual-by-environment interactions (IxE), as among-individual cross-context correlations were significantly less than +1. However, multi-trait analysis revealed the consequences of this plasticity variation were minimal. Specifically, we found little evidence for changes in the structure of I between mild and moderate stress contexts overall, and only minor changes between the two moderate contexts (avian versus piscine predator). 7. We show that a multivariate approach to assessing changes in among individual (co)variance across contexts can prevent the over-interpretation of statistically significant, but small, individual-by-environment effects. While behavioural flexibility enables populations (and individuals) to respond rapidly to changes in the environment, multivariate personality structure can be conserved strongly across such contexts.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding was provided by a grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, grant BB/L022656/1). A.J.Y. is supported by a BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 24 September 2017en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2435.12981
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/29436
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley for British Ecological Societyen_GB
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectCoping stylesen_GB
dc.subjectanimal personalityen_GB
dc.subjectindividual plasticityen_GB
dc.subjectindividual by environment interactionsen_GB
dc.subjectbehavioural syndromesen_GB
dc.subjectmulti-response modelen_GB
dc.subjectindividual differencesen_GB
dc.subjectPoecilia reticulataen_GB
dc.titleTesting the stability of behavioural coping style across stress contexts in the Trinidadian guppyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0269-8463
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalFunctional Ecologyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2017 The Authors. Functional Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.