dc.contributor.author | Owen, C | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-27T09:26:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-04-18 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article explores contrasting conceptions of the essentially contested concept obshchestvennyi kontrol’, as understood by the anti-systemic opposition and the Kremlin. It shows that the period of contention accompanying the 2011–2012 elections allowed competing narratives of this concept to emerge. First, the opposition presented it as a means for citizens to hold corrupt authorities accountable to the law; second, the Kremlin promoted it as a means to enhance government efficiency. The article shows that the Kremlin has co-opted the counter-hegemonic discourse into a new law which delimits the possibilities for enacting this concept in a fashion that recalls Soviet governance practices. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 69 (3), pp. 379 - 400 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/09668136.2017.1301882 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/29557 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) for Department of Central and East European Studies, University of Glasgow | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.title | The Struggle for Meaning of Obshchestvennyi Kontrol’ in Contemporary Russia: Civic Participation between Resistance and Compliance after the 2011–2012 Elections | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 0966-8136 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Europe-Asia Studies | en_GB |