Anarchism and non-domination
dc.contributor.author | Kinna, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Prichard, WAL | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-08T10:36:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-06-24 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this article we recover the classical anarchist deployment of republican tropes of non-domination, tyranny and slavery, to expose the conservative limits of the contemporary neo-Roman republican revival. For the anarchists, the modern nation state and the institution of private property are antithetical to freedom as non-domination, acting as structural constraints to freedom rather than the means for its realisation. We re-examine the grounds of this critique to advance two arguments. First, that a commitment to either the state or private property represents an unwarranted positive moral and ethical commitment that skews the negative theory of freedom contemporary republicans seek to develop. Second, the prior moral commitment to the state renders neo-Roman republicanism fundamentally conservative. Anarchist theories of freedom as non-domination push much further than the contemporary republican revival seems to permit, opening new possibilities for institutional and constitutional innovation while remaining consistent with the core republican normative value of non-domination. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 24 (3), pp. 221-240 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/13569317.2019.1633100 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/30200 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | |
dc.subject | Anarchism | en_GB |
dc.subject | Republicanism | en_GB |
dc.subject | Private property | en_GB |
dc.title | Anarchism and non-domination | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1356-9317 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Political Ideologies | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | |
refterms.dateFCD | 2017-11-08T10:36:54Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-07-02T13:21:11Z |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.