Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHelliwell, R
dc.contributor.authorHartley, S
dc.contributor.authorPearce, W
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, L
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-13T11:10:47Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-02
dc.description.abstractNGOs’ opposition to agricultural biotechnologies is rooted in scepticism about the framing of problems and solutions, rather than just emotion and dogma.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by funding from the following sources: the Governance and Public Policy Research Priority Area Award, University of Nottingham; the Business, Institutions and Policy Research Cluster Award, University of Exeter; and the Research Development Fund, Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield. We would like to thank Penny Polson (University of Manchester) for her assistance in data collection.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation2017, e201744385 - e201744385en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.15252/embr.201744385
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/30281
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEMBO Pressen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher's policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2017 The Authorsen_GB
dc.titleWhy are NGOs sceptical of genome editing?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1469-3178
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from EMBO Press via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEMBO reportsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record