Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBolleyer, N
dc.contributor.authorCorrea Vila, P
dc.contributor.authorKatz, G
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-20T14:59:12Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-21
dc.description.abstractExisting scholarship offers few answers to fundamental questions about the mortality of political parties in established party systems. Linking party research to the organization literature, we conceptualize two types of party death, dissolution and merger, reflecting distinct theoretical rationales. They underpin a new framework on party organizational mortality theorizing three sets of factors: those shaping mortality generally and those shaping dissolution or merger death exclusively. We test this framework on a new dataset covering the complete life cycles of 184 parties that entered 21 consolidated party systems over the last five decades, resorting to multilevel competing risks models to estimate the impact of party and country characteristics on the hazards of both types of death. Our findings not only show that dissolution and merger death are driven by distinct factors, but also that they represent separate logics not intrinsically related at either the party or systemic level.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 52 (1), pp. 36-68en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0010414018758764
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/30739
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2018. Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions
dc.titlePolitical Party Mortality in Established Party Systems: A Hierarchical Competing Risks Approachen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0010-4140
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalComparative Political Studiesen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2019-07-24T11:55:08Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record