dc.contributor.author | Rose, DC | |
dc.contributor.author | Morris, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Lobley, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Winter, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Sutherland, WJ | |
dc.contributor.author | Dicks, LV | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-05T14:17:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-02-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | The use of decision support tools on-farm may help to deliver evidence-based guidance to farmers, helping to
improve productivity and prevent environmental degradation. While much research has sought to increase the
uptake of decision support tools in practice, largely by identifying desirable characteristics of system design,
rather little work has used a spatial lens to investigate how they are actually used. Using Latour’s notion of ‘the
script’, this paper looks at the spatialities of technological and user re-scripting associated with the introduction
of decision support tools on-farm. Although there is some literature on how technologies may be re-scripted by
users, studies concerning decision support tools are more limited. Furthermore, while there are studies about
how technology (not decision support tools) re-scripts agricultural societies, these are generally concerned with
macro-level impacts (e.g. labour changes), rather than exploring life on individual farms. This paper, therefore,
focuses on exploring the spatialities of re-scripting, investigating how tools themselves are co-constituted in
various ways by different users in different spaces, but more particularly on how life on the farm may be changed
by the introduction of decision tools. A case study of decision support tool use on farms in England and Wales
demonstrates the need to explore spaces on individual farms if we wish to understand processes occurring at the
interface between tools and farmers. Firstly, situated knowledge held by farmers and advisers leads to resistance,
negotiation, and re-scripting of decision support tools, which are perceived to provide the ‘view from nowhere’.
Secondly, the introduction of decision support tools changes the workflows of farmers, affecting how and when
they interact with different spaces of their farm. In signalling the need for more research to theorise the spatialities
of re-scripting, we briefly explore how our work can inform policy and the development of decision
support tools. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research was funded as part of Defra’s Sustainable
Intensification Platform (Project Code LM0201). In addition, WJS was
funded by Arcadia, and LVD was funded by the UK Natural
Environment Research Council (grant codes NE/K015419/1 and NE/
N014472/1) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 89, pp. 11-18 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.12.006 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/31325 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.relation.source | Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the
online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.12.006 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/) | en_GB |
dc.subject | Co-production | en_GB |
dc.subject | Decision support systems | en_GB |
dc.subject | Decision support tools | en_GB |
dc.subject | Geography of knowledge | en_GB |
dc.subject | Geography of technology | en_GB |
dc.subject | Social construction of technology | en_GB |
dc.title | Exploring the spatialities of technological and user re-scripting: The case of decision support tools in UK agriculture | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-05T14:17:14Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0016-7185 | |
dc.description | This is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Geoforum | en_GB |