Incentives and Rewards to Engage in Open Science Activities
Leonelli, S
Date: 4 December 2017
Publisher
European Commission
Abstract
This report has been produced following the 3rd working meeting of the participants in the
Mutual Learning Exercise (MLE) on Open Science, which was hosted by Croatia in
Dubrovnik on 12 and 13 September 2017. It provides an overview and assessment of the
various practices currently being used and/or investigated to incentivise and ...
This report has been produced following the 3rd working meeting of the participants in the
Mutual Learning Exercise (MLE) on Open Science, which was hosted by Croatia in
Dubrovnik on 12 and 13 September 2017. It provides an overview and assessment of the
various practices currently being used and/or investigated to incentivise and reward
researchers and their institutions for engaging in open science activities.
The report starts with a section (section 2) outlining the Open Science agenda and aims
and its role within the broader research and science policy landscape. Section 3 outlines
the advantages and challenges underpinning the implementation of Open Science, thereby
providing the necessary background to the discussion on incentives and rewards which can
foster such activities. Section 4 reports on the discussions emerging from the MLE
participants and outlines key concerns and feedback gathered by Member States on how
Open Science can and should be fostered. Sections 4, 5 and 6 detail the incentives and
rewards that could be provided, or in some cases have already been implemented, by three
groups of key stakeholders: researchers themselves; research-performing institutions and
funding bodies; and national governments. In conclusion, a summary is made of the main
advantages and disadvantages of each type of incentive, with suggestions as to who is
mainly responsible for managing its implementation.
The report is based on a review of relevant background academic literature and policy
documents, discussions at previous MLE meetings (particularly the one on alternative
metrics for Open Science, which took place in May 2017 in Helsinki), and on answers to
open-ended questions sent to the MLE participants ahead of the meeting. Data have also
been sourced from the European Open Science Monitor which, at the time of writing, is the
most comprehensive source of information on Open Science implementation policies across
European Member States (http://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience).
Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy, and Anthropology
Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0