Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBennie, J
dc.contributor.authorDavies, TW
dc.contributor.authorCruse, D
dc.contributor.authorBell, F
dc.contributor.authorGaston, KJ
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-08T10:16:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-28
dc.description.abstractHuman settlements and transport networks are growing rapidly worldwide. Since the early 20th century their expansion has been accompanied by increasing illumination of the environment at night, a trend that is likely to continue over the decades to come. Consequently, a growing proportion of the world's ecosystems are exposed to artificial light at night, profoundly altering natural cycles of light and darkness. While in recent years there have been advances in our understanding of the effects of artificial light at night on the behaviour and physiology of animals in the wild, much less is known about the impacts on wild plants and natural or semi-natural vegetation composition. This is surprising, as effects of low-intensity light at night on flowering, phenology and growth form are well known in laboratory and greenhouse studies. In a long-term experimental field study we exposed a semi-natural grassland to artificial light at intensities and wavelengths typical of those experienced by roadside vegetation under street lighting. We found that lighting affected the trajectory of vegetation change, leading to significant differences in biomass and plant cover in the dominant species. Changes in flowering phenology were variable between years, with grass species flowering between 4 days earlier and 12 days later under artificial light. Policy implications. Our results demonstrate that artificial light, at levels equivalent to those in street-lit environments, can affect species composition in semi-natural vegetation. This highlights the importance of considering artificial light as a driver of vegetation change in urban, suburban and semi-natural ecosystems, and where possible, of minimising or excluding artificial light from habitats of conservation importance.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research leading to this paper has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 268504 to K.J.G.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 55 (1), pp. 442 - 450en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1365-2664.12927
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/31358
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley for British Ecological Societyen_GB
dc.relation.sourceThe data associated with this article are in ORE at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/27138en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/27138en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 28 April 2018 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Societyen_GB
dc.subjectartificial lighten_GB
dc.subjectfloweringen_GB
dc.subjectgrasslandsen_GB
dc.subjecthuman-impacted environmentsen_GB
dc.subjectlight pollutionen_GB
dc.subjectphenologyen_GB
dc.subjectphotoperiodismen_GB
dc.subjectphotopollutionen_GB
dc.subjectplantsen_GB
dc.subjectvegetation communityen_GB
dc.titleArtificial light at night alters grassland vegetation species composition and phenology (journal article)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0021-8901
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Applied Ecologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record