dc.contributor.author | Harris, RDF | |
dc.contributor.author | Li, X | |
dc.contributor.author | Qiao, F | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-11T10:34:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-06-14 | |
dc.description.abstract | We investigate the cross-sectional relationship between stock returns and a number of measures of option-implied beta. Using portfolio analysis, we show that the method proposed by Buss and Vilkov (2012) leads to a stronger relationship between implied beta and stock returns than other approaches. However, using the Fama and MacBeth (1973) cross-section regression methodology, we show that the relationship is not robust to the inclusion of other firm characteristics. We further show that a similar result holds for implied downside beta. We therefore conclude that there is no robust relation between option-implied beta and returns. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 14 June 2018. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/fut.21936 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/32797 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 14 June 2020 in compliance with publisher policy. | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.subject | Option-implied Beta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Downside Beta | en_GB |
dc.subject | Cross Section | en_GB |
dc.subject | Stock Returns | en_GB |
dc.title | Option-implied betas and the cross section of stock returns | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1096-9934 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Futures Markets | en_GB |