Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarris, RDF
dc.contributor.authorLi, X
dc.contributor.authorQiao, F
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-11T10:34:26Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-14
dc.description.abstractWe investigate the cross-sectional relationship between stock returns and a number of measures of option-implied beta. Using portfolio analysis, we show that the method proposed by Buss and Vilkov (2012) leads to a stronger relationship between implied beta and stock returns than other approaches. However, using the Fama and MacBeth (1973) cross-section regression methodology, we show that the relationship is not robust to the inclusion of other firm characteristics. We further show that a similar result holds for implied downside beta. We therefore conclude that there is no robust relation between option-implied beta and returns.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 14 June 2018.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/fut.21936
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32797
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 14 June 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subjectOption-implied Betaen_GB
dc.subjectDownside Betaen_GB
dc.subjectCross Sectionen_GB
dc.subjectStock Returnsen_GB
dc.titleOption-implied betas and the cross section of stock returnsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1096-9934
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Futures Marketsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record