Identifying primary care pathways from quality of care to outcomes and satisfaction using structural equation modeling
Ricci-Cabello, I; Stevens, S; Dalton, ARH; et al.Griffiths, RI; Campbell, JL; Valderas, JM
Date: 19 February 2017
Health Services Research
OBJECTIVE: To study the relationships between the different domains of quality of primary health care for the evaluation of health system performance and for informing policy decision making. DATA SOURCES: A total of 137 quality indicators collected from 7,607 English practices between 2011 and 2012. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study ...
OBJECTIVE: To study the relationships between the different domains of quality of primary health care for the evaluation of health system performance and for informing policy decision making. DATA SOURCES: A total of 137 quality indicators collected from 7,607 English practices between 2011 and 2012. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study at the practice level. Indicators were allocated to subdomains of processes of care ("quality assurance," "education and training," "medicine management," "access," "clinical management," and "patient-centered care"), health outcomes ("intermediate outcomes" and "patient-reported health status"), and patient satisfaction. The relationships between the subdomains were hypothesized in a conceptual model and subsequently tested using structural equation modeling. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The model supported two independent paths. In the first path, "access" was associated with "patient-centered care" (β = 0.63), which in turn was strongly associated with "patient satisfaction" (β = 0.88). In the second path, "education and training" was associated with "clinical management" (β = 0.32), which in turn was associated with "intermediate outcomes" (β = 0.69). "Patient-reported health status" was weakly associated with "patient-centered care" (β = -0.05) and "patient satisfaction" (β = 0.09), and not associated with "clinical management" or "intermediate outcomes." CONCLUSIONS: This is the first empirical model to simultaneously provide evidence on the independence of intermediate health care outcomes, patient satisfaction, and health status. The explanatory paths via technical quality clinical management and patient centeredness offer specific opportunities for the development of quality improvement initiatives.
Institute of Health Research
College of Medicine and Health
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Enhancing Britain’s rivers: an interdisciplinary analysis of selected issues arising from implementation of the Water Framework Directive Hampson, Danyel Ian (University of Exeter The Department of Economics, 20 December 2016)The Water Framework Directive requires reduced environmental impacts from human activities and for the assessment of the non-market benefits of pollution remediation schemes. This policy shift has exacerbated the research ...
Black, N; Burke, L; Forrest, CB; et al. (Springer Verlag (Germany), 15 November 2015)While the use of PROs in research is well established, many challenges lie ahead as their use is extended to other applications. There is consensus that health outcome evaluations that include PROs along with clinician-reported ...
The agreement between proxy and self-completed EQ-5D for care home residents was better for index scores than individual domains. Devine, Angela; Taylor, S.J.; Spencer, Anne; et al. (Elsevier, 1 September 2014)OBJECTIVE: Proxy measures are an alternative source of data for care home residents who are unable to complete the health utility measure, but the agreement levels between residents and care home staff for the EQ-5D have ...