Patient-reported outcomes: pathways to better health, better services, and better societies
Black, N; Burke, L; Forrest, CB; et al.Sieberer, UHR; Ahmed, S; Valderas, JM; Bartlett, SJ; Alonso, J
Date: 15 November 2015
Quality of Life Research
Springer Verlag (Germany)
While the use of PROs in research is well established, many challenges lie ahead as their use is extended to other applications. There is consensus that health outcome evaluations that include PROs along with clinician-reported outcomes and administrative data are necessary to inform clinical and policy decisions. The initiatives ...
While the use of PROs in research is well established, many challenges lie ahead as their use is extended to other applications. There is consensus that health outcome evaluations that include PROs along with clinician-reported outcomes and administrative data are necessary to inform clinical and policy decisions. The initiatives presented in this paper underline evolving recognition that PROs play a unique role in adding the patient perspective alongside clinical (e.g., blood pressure) and organizational (e.g., admission rates) indicators for evaluating the effects of new products, selecting treatments, evaluating quality of care, and monitoring the health of the population. In this paper, we first explore the use of PRO measures to support drug approval and labeling claims. We critically evaluate the evidence and challenges associated with using PRO measures to improve healthcare delivery at individual and population levels. We further discuss the challenges associated with selecting from the abundance of measures available, opportunities afforded by agreeing on common metrics for constructs of interest, and the importance of establishing an evidence base that supports integrating PRO measures across the healthcare system to improve outcomes. We conclude that the integration of PROs as a key end point within individual patient care, healthcare organization and program performance evaluations, and population surveillance will be essential for evaluating whether increased healthcare expenditure is translating into better health outcomes.
Institute of Health Research
College of Medicine and Health
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK--development and psychometric characteristics Campbell, John; Smith, P; Nissen, S; et al. (BioMed Central, 22 August 2009)BACKGROUND: The UK National GP Patient Survey is one of the largest ever survey programmes of patients registered to receive primary health care, inviting five million respondents to report their experience of NHS primary ...
How do adults with physical disability experience primary care? A nationwide cross-sectional survey of access among patients in England Popplewell, NTA; Rechel, BPD; Abel, GA (BMJ Publishing Group, 1 January 2014)Objectives: Almost a quarter of adults in England report a longstanding condition limiting physical activities. However, recent overseas evidence suggests poorer access to healthcare for disabled people. This study aimed ...
Can municipality-based post-discharge follow-up visits including a general practitioner reduce early readmission among the fragile elderly (65+ years old)? A randomized controlled trial Thygesen, LC; Fokdal, S; Gjørup, T; et al. (Taylor & Francis, 10 June 2015)OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how municipality-based post-discharge follow-up visits including a general practitioner and municipal nurse affect early readmission among high-risk older people discharged from a hospital department ...