Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, S
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17T13:28:43Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-09
dc.description.abstractA recent debate in the literature on delusions centers on the question of whether delusions are beliefs or not. In this paper, an overlooked distinction between egocentric and encyclopedic doxastic states is introduced and brought to bear on this debate, in particular with regard to delusions of misidentification. The result is that a more accurate characterization of the delusional subject’s doxastic point of view is made available. The patient has a genuine egocentric belief (“This man is not my father”), but fails to have the commonly attributed encyclopedic belief (“My father has been replaced by an impostor”).en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 4 (2), pp. 219 - 234en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13164-012-0125-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34322
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_GB
dc.rights© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013en_GB
dc.subjectEpistemic Modalen_GB
dc.subjectMental Fileen_GB
dc.subjectDoxastic Stateen_GB
dc.subjectConstitutive Normen_GB
dc.subjectSchool Frienden_GB
dc.titleEgocentric and Encyclopedic Doxastic States in Delusions of Misidentificationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-10-17T13:28:43Z
dc.identifier.issn1878-5158
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalReview of Philosophy and Psychologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record