dc.contributor.author | Skidelsky, EBH | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-07T09:38:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-11-08 | |
dc.description.abstract | It is often claimed that the core moral concepts are universal, though the words used to articulate them have changed significantly. I reject this claim. Concepts cannot be disentangled from words; as these latter change, they change too. Thus the philosophical analysis of moral concepts cannot overlook the history of the words by which these concepts have been expressed. In the second part of the essay, I illustrate this claim with the example of happiness, showing how its original ‘verdictive’ meaning was overlaid, in the course of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, with a new psychological sense. Knowledge of this history should make us cautious, I suggest in conclusion, of narrowly psychological accounts of happiness. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 08 November 2018. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01916599.2018.1534451 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/34666 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 08 May 2020 in compliance with publisher policy. | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. | |
dc.title | What moral philosophers can learn from the history of moral concepts | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 0191-6599 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | History of European Ideas | en_GB |