Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkidelsky, EBH
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-07T09:38:04Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-08
dc.description.abstractIt is often claimed that the core moral concepts are universal, though the words used to articulate them have changed significantly. I reject this claim. Concepts cannot be disentangled from words; as these latter change, they change too. Thus the philosophical analysis of moral concepts cannot overlook the history of the words by which these concepts have been expressed. In the second part of the essay, I illustrate this claim with the example of happiness, showing how its original ‘verdictive’ meaning was overlaid, in the course of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, with a new psychological sense. Knowledge of this history should make us cautious, I suggest in conclusion, of narrowly psychological accounts of happiness.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 08 November 2018.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01916599.2018.1534451
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34666
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 08 May 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.titleWhat moral philosophers can learn from the history of moral conceptsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0191-6599
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalHistory of European Ideasen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record