Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDe Prijcker, S
dc.contributor.authorManigart, S
dc.contributor.authorCollewaert, V
dc.contributor.authorVanacker, T
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-05T08:56:09Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-15
dc.description.abstractUsing a resource dependence perspective, we theorize and show that non-venture-capital-backed ventures founded in U.S. states with a lower availability of venture capital (VC) are more likely to relocate to California (CA) or Massachusetts (MA)—the two VC richest states—compared to ventures founded in states with a greater availability of VC. Moreover, controlling for self-selection, ventures that relocate to CA or MA subsequently have a greater probability of attracting initial VC compared to ventures that stay in their home state. We discuss the implications for theory, future research, and practice.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 15 November 2017en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1042258717739003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36263
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2017en_GB
dc.subjectventure capitalen_GB
dc.subjectentrepreneurial financeen_GB
dc.subjectrelocationen_GB
dc.subjectresource dependence theoryen_GB
dc.titleRelocation to get venture capital : a resource dependence perspectiveen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-03-05T08:56:09Z
dc.identifier.issn1042-2587
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEntrepreneurship Theory and Practiceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-11
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-09-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-03-04T15:04:50Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-03-05T08:56:11Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record