Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKrammer, SMS
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-06T10:52:31Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-03
dc.description.abstractThis paper posits that corporate and technological diversification of firms and their relatedness in terms of products and technologies will impact their propensity to form technological alliances. It argues that both higher levels of diversification and greater relatedness signal superior capabilities and available resources to prospective partners that will facilitate exploration and exploitation of technological assets in an alliance. These theoretical conjectures are tested using a dataset of all tire producers worldwide between 1985 and 1996 that combines detailed firm data on establishment, patenting, and alliance activities. The results indicate that complementarity in terms of corporate and technological diversification strategies, as well as partner characteristics (e.g., size, age, and technological capabilities) drive exploitation alliances. Moreover, firms with similar product portfolios are more likely to engage in exploitative interactions. In contrast, exploration alliances exhibit strong partner similarity across all firm characteristics. Both corporate and technological diversification have positive effects on firms' propensity to engage in exploration, while technological distance has a negative nonlinear one.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 45, pp. 517 - 532en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36315
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2015. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ en_GB
dc.titleThe role of diversification profiles and dyadic characteristics in the formation of technological alliances: Differences between exploitation and exploration in a low-tech industryen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-03-06T10:52:31Z
dc.identifier.issn0048-7333
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalResearch Policyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-10-25
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2015-12-03
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-03-06T10:50:41Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-03-06T10:52:33Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2015. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2015. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/