European Social Anthropology in 2018: an Increasingly Recursive Public
Hughes, G
Date: 29 April 2019
Journal
Social Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Publisher DOI
Abstract
In 2018, social anthropology finds itself increasingly concerned with its technical, legal, and
political conditions of possibility. The long-term effects of austerity, financialization, and the
technological transformation of media on teaching, research, and publishing have led to intense
struggles over the labor and property regimes ...
In 2018, social anthropology finds itself increasingly concerned with its technical, legal, and
political conditions of possibility. The long-term effects of austerity, financialization, and the
technological transformation of media on teaching, research, and publishing have led to intense
struggles over the labor and property regimes underpinning the discipline. In responding to these
challenges, anthropologists seem to be re-conceptualizing their own personhood and labor
through the diverse conceptualizations of their interlocutors. However, it is also important to
remember what makes social anthropology and its unique professional challenges but a small
facet of a larger human condition. By way of conclusion, I offer kinship (the public’s constitutive
other) as one potential means of grappling with the limitations of social anthropology’s own
publicity.
Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy, and Anthropology
Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0