Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalworth, T
dc.contributor.authorYearworth, M
dc.contributor.authorShrieves, L
dc.contributor.authorSillitto, H
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-15T12:24:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-09
dc.description.abstractMonitoring of the technical progression of projects is highly difficult, especially for complex projects where the current state may be obscured by the use of traditional project metrics. Late detection of technical problems leads to high resolution costs and delayed delivery of projects. To counter this, we report on the development of a updated technical metrics process designed to help ensure the on-time delivery, to both cost and schedule, of high quality products by a U.K. Systems Engineering Company. Published best practice suggests the necessity of using planned parameter profiles crafted to support technical metrics; but these have proven difficult to create due to the variance in project types and noise within individual project systems. This paper presents research findings relevant to the creation of a model to help set valid planned parameter profiles for a diverse range of system engineering products; and in establishing how to help project users get meaningful use out of these planned parameter profiles. We present a solution using a System Dynamics (SD) model capable of generating suitable planned parameter profiles. The final validated and verified model overlays the idea of a learning “S-curve” abstraction onto a rework cycle system archetype. Once applied in SD this matched the mental models of experienced engineering managers within the company, and triangulates with validated empirical data from within the literature. This has delivered three key benefits in practice: the development of a heuristic for understanding the work flow within projects, as a result of the interaction between a project learning system and defect discovery; the ability to produce morphologically accurate performance baselines for metrics; and an approach for enabling teams to generate benefit from the model via the use of problem structuring methodology.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 19 (4), pp. 334 - 350en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sys.21349
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/G037353/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/36500
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley for International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE)en_GB
dc.rights© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_GB
dc.subjecttechnical metricsen_GB
dc.subjectplanned parameter profilesen_GB
dc.subjectreworken_GB
dc.subjectaction researchen_GB
dc.subjectsystem dynamicsen_GB
dc.titleEstimating Project Performance through a System Dynamics Learning Modelen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-03-15T12:24:59Z
dc.identifier.issn1098-1241
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalSystems Engineeringen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-05-30
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-05-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-03-15T12:22:44Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2019-03-15T12:25:03Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record