Context. We implement an electron avalanche photodiode (e-APD) in the MIRC-X instrument, upgrade of the 6-telescope nearinfrared imager MIRC, at the CHARA array. This technology should improve the sensitivity of near-infrared interferometry.
Aims. We characterize a near-infrared C-RED ONE camera from First Light Imaging (FLI) using ...
Context. We implement an electron avalanche photodiode (e-APD) in the MIRC-X instrument, upgrade of the 6-telescope nearinfrared imager MIRC, at the CHARA array. This technology should improve the sensitivity of near-infrared interferometry.
Aims. We characterize a near-infrared C-RED ONE camera from First Light Imaging (FLI) using an e-APD from Leonardo (previously SELEX).
Methods. We first used the classical Mean-Variance analysis to measure the system gain and the amplification gain. We then developed
a physical model of the statistical distribution of the camera output signal. This model is based on multiple convolutions of the Poisson
statistic, the intrinsic avalanche gain distribution, and the observed distribution of the background signal. At low flux level, this model
constraints independently the incident illumination level, the total gain, and the excess noise factor of the amplification.
Results. We measure a total transmission of 48 ± 3% including the cold filter and the Quantum Efficiency. We measure a system
gain of 0.49 ADU/e, a readout noise of 10 ADU, and amplification gains as high as 200. These results are consistent between the two
methods and therefore validate our modeling approach. The measured excess noise factor based on the modeling is 1.47 ± 0.03, with
no obvious dependency with flux level or amplification gain.
Conclusions. The presented model allows measuring the characteristics of the e-APD array at low flux level independently of preexisting calibration. With < 0.3 electron equivalent readout noise at kilohertz frame rates, we confirm the revolutionary performances of
the camera with respect to the PICNIC or HAWAII technologies. However, the measured excess noise factor is significantly higher
than the one claimed in the literature (<1.25), and explains why counting multiple photons remains challenging with this camera.