Towards a strategic research agenda for social sciences and humanities in radiological protection
dc.contributor.author | Perko, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Van Oudheusden, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Turcanu, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Pölzl-Voil, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Oughton, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Schieber, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Schneider, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Zölzer, F | |
dc.contributor.author | Mays, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Martell, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Baudé, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Choffel de Witte, I | |
dc.contributor.author | Prlic, I | |
dc.contributor.author | Cantone, MC | |
dc.contributor.author | Salomaa, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Duranova, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Economides, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Molyneux-Hodgson, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-29T08:34:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03-13 | |
dc.description.abstract | Reflecting a change in funding strategies for European research projects, and a commitment to the idea of responsible research and innovation in radiological protection (RP), a collective of research institutes and universities have developed a prospective Strategic Research Agenda (SRA) for Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in radiological protection. This is the first time such a research agenda has been proposed. This paper identifies six research lines of interest and concern: 1) Effects of social, psychological and economic aspects on RP behaviour; 2) Holistic approaches to the governance of radiological risks; 3) Responsible research and innovation in RP; 4) Stakeholder engagement and participatory processes in RP research, development, policy and practice; 5) Risk communication; and 6) RP cultures. These topics were developed through broad stakeholder consultation, in conjunction with activities carried out in the framework of various projects and initiatives (EU H2020 CONCERT programme, the EU FP7 projects OPERRA, PREPARE and EAGLE, the 2015-2018 RICOMET series of conferences, and the 2014 and 2016 International Symposia on Ethics of Environmental Health); as well as through dialogues with members of the European radiation protection research communities. The six research lines open opportunities to integrate a range of key social and ethical considerations into RP, thereby expanding research opportunities and programmes and fostering collaborative approaches to research and innovation. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Euratom | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 13 March 2019 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1088/1361-6498/ab0f89 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | 662287 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/36922 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | IOP Publishing | en_GB |
dc.rights | As the Version of Record of this article is going to be / has been published on a gold open access basis under a CC BY 3.0 licence, this Accepted Manuscript is available for reuse under a CC BY 3.0 licence immediately. Everyone is permitted to use all or part of the original content in this article, provided that they adhere to all the terms of the licence https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/3.0 Although reasonable endeavours have been taken to obtain all necessary permissions from third parties to include their copyrighted content within this article, their full citation and copyright line may not be present in this Accepted Manuscript version. Before using any content from this article, please refer to the Version of Record on IOPscience once published for full citation and copyright details, as permissions may be required. All third party content is fully copyright protected and is not publish | en_GB |
dc.subject | Radiological protection | en_GB |
dc.subject | ethics | en_GB |
dc.subject | social sciences and humanities | en_GB |
dc.subject | strategic research agenda | en_GB |
dc.subject | responsible research and innovation | en_GB |
dc.title | Towards a strategic research agenda for social sciences and humanities in radiological protection | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-29T08:34:54Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0952-4746 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Radiological Protection | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-03-13 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-03-13 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-04-27T19:36:43Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-04-29T08:34:59Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as As the Version of Record of this article is going to be / has been published on a gold open access basis under a CC BY 3.0 licence, this Accepted
Manuscript is available for reuse under a CC BY 3.0 licence immediately.
Everyone is permitted to use all or part of the original content in this article, provided that they adhere to all the terms of the licence
https://creativecommons.org/licences/by/3.0
Although reasonable endeavours have been taken to obtain all necessary permissions from third parties to include their copyrighted content
within this article, their full citation and copyright line may not be present in this Accepted Manuscript version. Before using any content from this
article, please refer to the Version of Record on IOPscience once published for full citation and copyright details, as permissions may be required.
All third party content is fully copyright protected and is not publish