dc.contributor.author | Wilkinson, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-30T12:47:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-08-05 | |
dc.description.abstract | I argue for an overlooked distinction between perceptual presence and volumetric content, and
flesh it out in terms of predictive processing. Within the predictive processing framework we can
distinguish between agent-active and object-active expectations. The former expectations
account for perceptual presence, while the latter account for volumetric content. I then support
this position with reference to how experiences of presence are created by virtual reality
technologies, and end by reflecting on what this means for the relationship between
sensorimotor enactivism and predictive processing. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 5 August 2019 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11097-019-09632-7 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/38162 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_GB |
dc.subject | Predictive processing | |
dc.subject | Perceptual presence | |
dc.subject | Sensorimotor contingencies | |
dc.title | Distinguishing volumetric content from perceptual presence within a predictive processing framework | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-30T12:47:04Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1572-8676 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Springer via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-07-26 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-07-26 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-07-30T10:23:30Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-08-22T12:25:02Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |