Towards a socio-technical understanding of discretion: a case study of Taser and police use of force
dc.contributor.author | Dymond, A | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-17T09:13:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-09-16 | |
dc.description.abstract | Using a case study of the ‘less lethal’ electric-shock weapon the Taser in English and Welsh policing, this article argues that the notion of discretion as an arena in which police officers are able to exercise free will can be overstated. Drawing on insights from Science and Technology Studies, it is argued that discretionary decisions may well be structured not only by the human agency but also by the presence and agency of nonhumans and the socio-technical networks within which they are embedded. Whilst existing work has recognised the human and societal influences impacting officer decision making, this article draws on Science and Technology Studies to argue there are merits to a distinctly socio-technical approach to discretion. Broader implications for discretion by police officers and other ‘street level bureaucrats’, for STS and criminology and for policies around Taser are also discussed. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 16 September 2019 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/10439463.2019.1660338 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | ES/N016564/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/38771 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis (Routledge) | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Taser | en_GB |
dc.subject | discretion | en_GB |
dc.subject | science and technology studies | en_GB |
dc.subject | policing | en_GB |
dc.subject | less-lethal weapons | en_GB |
dc.title | Towards a socio-technical understanding of discretion: a case study of Taser and police use of force | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-17T09:13:51Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1043-9463 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data access statement: Further information on the data used and findings of this study may be available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research and Policy | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-08-17 | |
exeter.funder | ::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-09-16 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-09-16T13:32:56Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2019-09-17T09:13:53Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.