dc.contributor.author | Bettiza, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Lewis, D | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-01T10:05:24Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-02-13 | |
dc.description.abstract | Are rising authoritarian powers such as China and Russia converging towards or
challenging the normative structures of the liberal international order? This
article argues that scholarship on norm contestation provides a fruitful
theoretical avenue for addressing this question. It finds, however, that this
literature has problematically tended to either overlook or externalize power
dynamics from norm contestation. The article therefore proposes and develops a
power political approach to norm contestation that, informed by a realpolitik
sensibility, more explicitly and consistently makes power central to the analysis. A
power political perspective conceptualizes norm contestation as the expression of
battles for influence in world politics that take place at the ideational level and
through symbolic instruments. It understands these struggles as occurring in the
context of an international system profoundly marked by conflicting interests,
cultural pluralism, hierarchical structures, and power asymmetries. This power
political lens is then used to identify four modes of contestation Russian and
Chinese actors are engaged in: liberal performance, liberal mimicry,
civilizational essentialization, and counter-norm entrepreneurship. It empirically
explores how these contestatory practices express themselves at different intensity
levels – applicatory, meaning, and validity – and display specific power political
logics – fragmenting and integrative – with the goal of undermining the ideational
hegemony of liberal Western-based actors and structures in world politics, and
advancing alternative non-liberal visions of domestic and international order.
Along with contributing to the literature on norms, this paper also makes a
broader intervention in current debates about rising powers and the future of the
liberal international order | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 13 February 2020 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/jogss/ogz075 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/39452 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 13 February 2022 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Liberal International Order | en_GB |
dc.subject | Norm Contestation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Power Politics | en_GB |
dc.subject | Rising Powers | en_GB |
dc.subject | Russia | en_GB |
dc.subject | China | en_GB |
dc.title | Authoritarian powers and norm contestation in the liberal international order: theorizing the power politics of ideas and identity | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-01T10:05:24Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2057-3189 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2057-3170 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Global Security Studies | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-10-31 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-10-31 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-10-31T15:51:14Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-02-13T00:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |