Navigating the maze: Qualitative research methodologies and their philosophical foundations
dc.contributor.author | Bleiker, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Morgan-Trimmer, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Knapp, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Hopkins, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-21T15:04:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07-19 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: One of the three objectives of the Society and College of Radiographers is the promotion and dissemination of research in radiography and radiotherapy. This article aims to assist in the production of high standard research by explaining how transparency in reporting the underpinning philosophical basis of a qualitative study can be achieved in addition to the more customary descriptions of how data were collected and analysed. Key findings: Unlike their quantitative equivalent, qualitative research methodologies are less well understood and reported in radiography research, in particular the philosophical and epistemological assumptions which underpin the methods used. Conclusion: Demonstrating consistency between the philosophical position taken and the methods used within a study is an important aspect of research quality. Implications for practice: Qualitative research can offer valuable insights into the social, organisational, behavioural and interpersonal aspects of medical imaging practice. These may include wellbeing, attitudes, perceptions and beliefs, leadership, management practices, education, professionalism and a wide range of issues around patients' experiences during medical imaging. Patient care and outcomes can be positively impacted as a result of acquiring these insights. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 25, pp. S4 - S8 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.radi.2019.06.008 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/39690 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 19 July 2020 in compliance with publisher policy. | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2019. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | Qualitative research | en_GB |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_GB |
dc.subject | Ontology | en_GB |
dc.subject | Epistemology | en_GB |
dc.subject | Methodology | en_GB |
dc.subject | Radiography research | en_GB |
dc.title | Navigating the maze: Qualitative research methodologies and their philosophical foundations | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-21T15:04:40Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1078-8174 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Radiography | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-06-26 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-07-19 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2019-11-21T15:01:44Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/