Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorD'Attoma, J
dc.contributor.authorVolintiru, C
dc.contributor.authorMalézieux, A
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-26T14:27:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-25
dc.description.abstractThis paper brings an important empirical contribution to the academic literature by examining whether gender differences in tax compliance are due to higher prosociality among women. We conducted a large cross-national tax compliance experiment carried out in different countries – Italy, UK, USA, Sweden, and Romania. We uncover that women declare a significantly higher percentage of their income than men in all five countries. While some scholars have argued that differences in honesty between men and women are mediated by prosociality, we find that women are not more prosocial than men in all countries and we do not find a mediating effect of prosocial behaviour on tax compliance. Though tax evasion is a form of dishonesty, the tax compliance experiment is quite different from an honesty experiment, which is certainly one explanation for the different results. We conclude that although differences in prosociality between men and women seem to be context dependent, differences in tax compliance are indeed much more consistent.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 25 January 2020.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/cesifo/ifz016
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/S00713X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/39813
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP) for CESifo Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://euiresdata.eui.eu/xmlui/handle/123456789/24en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 25 January 2022 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Ifo Institute, Munich. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
dc.titleGender, Social Value Orientation, and Tax Complianceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-11-26T14:27:21Z
dc.identifier.issn1610-241X
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: See http://euiresdata.eui.eu/xmlui/handle/123456789/24 for the full dataset and questionnaire.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalCESifo Economic Studiesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-26
exeter.funder::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-11-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-11-26T13:11:53Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record