European Academy for Medicine of Ageing session participants’ report on malnutrition assessment and diagnostic methods; an international survey
Sanchez-Rodriguez, D; Annweiler, C; Marco, E; et al.Hope, S; Piotrovicz, K; Surquin, M; Ranhoff, A; Van Den Noortgate, N
Date: 2 December 2019
Article
Journal
Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier
Publisher DOI
Abstract
Introduction: Malnutrition and nutrition-related diseases are associated with hospital
admissions, disability, institutionalization, and mortality in older people. Specialists in
Geriatric Medicine and nutrition evaluate nutritional status as part of the comprehensive
geriatric assessment; however, malnutrition still remains ...
Introduction: Malnutrition and nutrition-related diseases are associated with hospital
admissions, disability, institutionalization, and mortality in older people. Specialists in
Geriatric Medicine and nutrition evaluate nutritional status as part of the comprehensive
geriatric assessment; however, malnutrition still remains under-recognized and undermanaged. Our survey explored nutrition assessment approaches used in daily clinical practice
by geriatricians across Europe.
Methods: A 19-item survey on methods and instruments for malnutrition assessment in
geriatric settings, and details of any national guidelines, was sent to 40 postgraduate fellows of
the European Academy of Medicine of Ageing (EAMA, 2017-2019 class).
Results: Thirty-six of the 40 eligible EAMA participants, representing 14 European countries,
responded. In clinical practice, MNA and MNA-SF were most frequently used for screening
(44.1%, 52.9%, respectively) and diagnosing (45.7%, 40.0%) malnutrition. Weight loss (n=36,
100%), body mass index (n=30, 85.7%), and low energy/food intake (n=27, 77.1%) were the
most frequent clinical variables considered. The absolute and relative amount of weight loss,
and over what time period, varied widely. These routinely considered clinical factors contribute
to validated GLIM, ASPEN-AND and ESPEN criteria for diagnosis of malnutrition, but these
criteria were seldom used (GLIM=0%, ASPEN=0%; n=9, ESPEN=25.7%). National
guidelines were available in 9 of the 14 countries, and generally recommended MNA and
MNA-SF for community-dwelling and hospitalized older patients. Albumin was often
suggested as a nutritional marker.
Conclusions: Nutritional assessment is systematically performed in geriatrics; but differs
widely among geriatricians and countries. Harmonizing guidelines with the new international
consensus might provide best-evidence care for older people across Europe.
Institute of Biomedical & Clinical Science
Collections of Former Colleges
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/