Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Rodriguez, D
dc.contributor.authorAnnweiler, C
dc.contributor.authorMarco, E
dc.contributor.authorHope, S
dc.contributor.authorPiotrovicz, K
dc.contributor.authorSurquin, M
dc.contributor.authorRanhoff, A
dc.contributor.authorVan Den Noortgate, N
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-09T12:49:47Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-02
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Malnutrition and nutrition-related diseases are associated with hospital admissions, disability, institutionalization, and mortality in older people. Specialists in Geriatric Medicine and nutrition evaluate nutritional status as part of the comprehensive geriatric assessment; however, malnutrition still remains under-recognized and undermanaged. Our survey explored nutrition assessment approaches used in daily clinical practice by geriatricians across Europe. Methods: A 19-item survey on methods and instruments for malnutrition assessment in geriatric settings, and details of any national guidelines, was sent to 40 postgraduate fellows of the European Academy of Medicine of Ageing (EAMA, 2017-2019 class). Results: Thirty-six of the 40 eligible EAMA participants, representing 14 European countries, responded. In clinical practice, MNA and MNA-SF were most frequently used for screening (44.1%, 52.9%, respectively) and diagnosing (45.7%, 40.0%) malnutrition. Weight loss (n=36, 100%), body mass index (n=30, 85.7%), and low energy/food intake (n=27, 77.1%) were the most frequent clinical variables considered. The absolute and relative amount of weight loss, and over what time period, varied widely. These routinely considered clinical factors contribute to validated GLIM, ASPEN-AND and ESPEN criteria for diagnosis of malnutrition, but these criteria were seldom used (GLIM=0%, ASPEN=0%; n=9, ESPEN=25.7%). National guidelines were available in 9 of the 14 countries, and generally recommended MNA and MNA-SF for community-dwelling and hospitalized older patients. Albumin was often suggested as a nutritional marker. Conclusions: Nutritional assessment is systematically performed in geriatrics; but differs widely among geriatricians and countries. Harmonizing guidelines with the new international consensus might provide best-evidence care for older people across Europe.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 2 December 2019en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clnesp.2019.11.007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40032
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 2 December 2020 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rights© 2019. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ en_GB
dc.titleEuropean Academy for Medicine of Ageing session participants’ report on malnutrition assessment and diagnostic methods; an international surveyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-12-09T12:49:47Z
dc.identifier.issn0261-5614
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalClinical Nutritionen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-26
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-12-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-12-09T11:54:13Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-12-02T00:00:00Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ 
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/