Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRussel, D
dc.contributor.authorTurnpenny, J
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-19T15:21:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-31
dc.description.abstractWhat helps or limits the use of ecosystem services ideas in practice? This paper develops and tests a new institutionalist-based analytical scheme to explore how ecosystem services as a ‘new’ policy idea might interact with established policy regimes, processes and norms. The scheme is based on three different decision-making levels: micro, meso and macro. To test the plausibility of the scheme, it is applied to the case of the UK where a specific Ecosystem Services Framework (ESF) was prioritised as a new way of doing environmental policy after 2011. Drawing on findings from 32 elite interviews, the paper shows how dynamics at all three levels intersect with differing institutional explanations. It helps explain important factors for embedding - or restricting embedding - of the ESF in policy-making. The scheme provides a useful way to link analysis of the ‘lived experience’ of policy actors implementing the ESF with the institutional landscape they occupy, and allows for a nuanced and integrated analysis of the potential barriers faced by ecosystem services ideas generally.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 25 (1), article 9
dc.identifier.doi10.5751/ES-11342-250109
dc.identifier.grantnumber560en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40150
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherResilience Allianceen_GB
dc.rights© 2020 by the author(s). Open access. Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.
dc.titleEmbedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysisen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-12-19T15:21:19Z
dc.identifier.issn1195-5449
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Resilience Alliance via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalEcology and Society: a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainabilityen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-25
exeter.funder::Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-11-25
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-12-19T14:15:34Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-02-27T13:02:36Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 by the author(s). Open access. Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020 by the author(s). Open access. Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.