Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrete, P
dc.contributor.authorVlaykov, DG
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, W
dc.contributor.authorSchleicher, DRG
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-14T13:53:53Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-24
dc.description.abstractLarge-eddy simulations (LES) are a powerful tool in understanding processes that are inaccessible by direct simulations due to their complexity, for example, in the highly turbulent regime. However, their accuracy and success depends on a proper subgrid-scale (SGS) model that accounts for the unresolved scales in the simulation. We evaluate the applicability of two traditional SGS models, namely the eddy-viscosity (EV) and the scale-similarity (SS) models, and one recently proposed nonlinear (NL) SGS model in the realm of compressible magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence. Using 209 simulations of decaying, supersonic (initial sonic Mach number Ms≈3) MHD turbulence with a shock-capturing scheme and varying resolution, SGS model, and filter, we analyze the ensemble statistics of kinetic and magnetic energy spectra and structure functions. Furthermore, we compare the temporal evolution of lower- and higher-order statistical moments of the spatial distributions of kinetic and magnetic energy, vorticity, current density, and dilatation magnitudes. We find no statistical influence on the evolution of the flow by any model if grid-scale quantities are used to calculate SGS contributions. In addition, the SS models, which employ an explicit filter, have no impact in general. On the contrary, both the EV and NL models change the statistics if an explicit filter is used. For example, they slightly increase the dissipation on the smallest scales. We demonstrate that the nonlinear model improves higher-order statistics already with a small explicit filter, i.e., a three-point stencil. The results of, e.g., the structure functions or the skewness and kurtosis of the current density distribution are closer to the ones obtained from simulations at higher resolution. In addition, no additional regularization to stabilize the model is required. We conclude that the nonlinear model with a small explicit filter is suitable for application in more complex scenarios when higher-order statistics are important.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Gottingenen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMax-Planck-Institut MPI für Dynamik und Selbstorganisationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipConicyt Fondecyt: Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológicoen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCentro de Astrofísica y Tecnologías Afines CATAen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 95 (3), article 033206en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1103/PhysRevE.95.033206
dc.identifier.grantnumber1161247en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberPFB-06/2007en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40411
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Physical Societyen_GB
dc.rights© 2017 American Physical Societyen_GB
dc.titleComparative statistics of selected subgrid-scale models in large-eddy simulations of decaying, supersonic magnetohydrodynamic turbulenceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-01-14T13:53:53Z
dc.identifier.issn2470-0045
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from the American Physical Society via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalPhysical Review Een_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-03-24
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-01-14T13:50:09Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-01-14T13:54:02Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record