Reconciliation as Ideology and Politics
Schaap, Andrew
Date: 9 July 2008
Article
Journal
Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory
Publisher
Wiley Blackwell
Publisher DOI
Related links
Abstract
Against the critique of reconciliation as an irredeemably ideological concept, I want to retrieve the
concept of reconciliation for a popular politics. As a term of political discourse, reconciliation has been objected to
for being: too vague, illiberal, question-begging, assimilative, quietist and exculpatory. Each objection ...
Against the critique of reconciliation as an irredeemably ideological concept, I want to retrieve the
concept of reconciliation for a popular politics. As a term of political discourse, reconciliation has been objected to
for being: too vague, illiberal, question-begging, assimilative, quietist and exculpatory. Each objection draws
attention to the tendency of every state-sanctioned project of reconciliation to become ideological in the Marxist sense.
In contrast, a politics of reconciliation would: be enabled by the contestability of what ‘real’ reconciliation requires;
refer to human rights in their constitutive political sense; invoke moral community to politicise the terms of political
belonging; acknowledge the risk that the beginning it seeks to enact in the present may not come to pass; be
predicated on a gratitude that a willingness to forgive makes reconciliation available as political opportunity in the
first place, and; conceive collective responsibility in terms of an ongoing responsiveness to the legacy of past wrongs
that might unite the community-to-be-reconciled.
Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy, and Anthropology
Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0