| 24 May 2016 | Challenges in constraining anthropogenic aerosol effects on cloud radiative forcing using present-day spatiotemporal variability
| Ghan, S; Wang, M; Zhang, S; et al. |
| 19 January 2024 | Cloud condensation nuclei concentrations derived from the CAMS reanalysis
| Block, K; Haghighatnasab, M; Partridge, DG; et al. |
| 30 April 2024 | Cloud response to co-condensation of water and organic vapors over the boreal forest
| Heikkinen, L; Partridge, DG; Blichner, S; et al. |
| 27 January 2021 | The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign
| Haywood, JM; Abel, SJ; Barrett, PA; et al. |
| 26 April 2017 | Constraining the instantaneous aerosol influence on cloud albedo
| Gryspeerdt, E; Quaas, J; Ferrachat, S; et al. |
| 21 August 2019 | The global aerosol-climate model ECHAM6.3-HAM2.3-Part 2: Cloud evaluation, aerosol radiative forcing, and climate sensitivity
| Neubauer, D; Ferrachat, S; Siegenthaler-Le Drian, C; et al. |
| 13 February 2024 | How well are aerosol–cloud interactions represented in climate models? – Part 1: Understanding the sulfate aerosol production from the 2014–15 Holuhraun eruption
| Jordan, G; Malavelle, F; Chen, Y; et al. |
| 29 January 2016 | The importance of temporal collocation for the evaluation of aerosol models with observations
| Schutgens, NAJ; Partridge, DG; Stier, P |
| 26 June 2014 | The importance of vertical velocity variability for estimates of the indirect aerosol effects
| West, REL; Stier, P; Jones, A; et al. |
| 4 April 2023 | Including ash in UKESM1 model simulations of the Raikoke volcanic eruption reveals improved agreement with observations
| Wells, AF; Jones, A; Osborne, M; et al. |
| 25 July 2011 | Inverse modeling of cloud-aerosol interactions – Part 1: Detailed response surface analysis
| Partridge, DG; Vrugt, JA; Tunved, P; et al. |
| 16 March 2012 | Inverse modelling of cloud-aerosol interactions – Part 2: Sensitivity tests on liquid phase clouds using a Markov chain Monte Carlo based simulation approach
| Partridge, DG; Vrugt, JA; Tunved, P; et al. |
| 6 September 2016 | Inverse modelling of Köhler theory – Part 1: A response surface analysis of CCN spectra with respect to surface-active organic species
| Lowe, S; Partridge, DG; Topping, D; et al. |
| 18 November 2019 | Key drivers of cloud response to surface-active organics
| Lowe, SJ; Partridge, DG; Davies, JF; et al. |
| 16 September 2014 | Links between satellite-retrieved aerosol and precipitation
| Gryspeerdt, E; Stier, P; Partridge, DG |
| 28 May 2017 | Microphysical explanation of the RH-dependent water affinity of biogenic organic aerosol and its importance for climate
| Rastak, N; Pajunoja, A; Acosta Navarro, JC; et al. |
| 1 November 2010 | New trajectory-driven aerosol and chemical process model Chemical and Aerosol Lagrangian Model (CALM)
| Tunved, P; Partridge, DG; Korhonen, H |
| 4 March 2016 | On the characteristics of aerosol indirect effect based on dynamic regimes in global climate models
| Zhang, S; Wang, M; Ghan, SJ; et al. |
| 24 May 2022 | Physical and Chemical Properties of Cloud Droplet Residuals and Aerosol Particles During the Arctic Ocean 2018 Expedition
| Karlsson, L; Baccarini, A; Duplessis, P; et al. |
| 7 February 2024 | Process-evaluation of forest aerosol-cloud-climate feedback shows clear evidence from observations and large uncertainty in models
| Blichner, SM; Yli-Juuti, T; Mielonen, T; et al. |
