dc.contributor.author | Chakravarty, Surajeet | en_GB |
dc.contributor.author | Kaplan, Todd R. | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-10T11:31:31Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-25T10:25:37Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-19T15:52:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-02 | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | Often an organization or government must allocate goods without collecting payment in
return. This may pose a difficult problem either when agents receiving those goods have
private information in regards to their values or needs or when discriminating among agents using known di¤erences is not a viable option. In this paper, we find an optimal mechanism to allocate goods when the designer is benevolent. While the designer cannot charge agents, he can receive a costly but wasteful signal from them. We find conditions for which ignoring these costly signals by giving agents equal share (or using lotteries if the goods are
indivisible) is optimal. In other cases, those that send the highest signal should receive the goods; however, we then show that there exist cases where more complicated mechanisms are superior. Finally, we show that the optimal mechanism is independent of the scarcity of
the goods being allocated. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10036/109383 | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | University of Exeter Business School | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Economics Department discussion paper series | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 10/04 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://business-school.exeter.ac.uk/economics/papers/ | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://business-school.exeter.ac.uk/documents/papers/economics/2010/1004.pdf | en_GB |
dc.subject | resource allocation | en_GB |
dc.title | Optimal allocation without transfer payments | en_GB |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-10T11:31:31Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2011-01-25T10:25:37Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-19T15:52:55Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1473-3307 | en_GB |
dc.description | Discussion paper | en_GB |