Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTettenborn, Andrewen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-15T16:09:51Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T11:52:51Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T16:55:16Z
dc.date.issued2002-04-25en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis article looks at attempts which have been, and are being, made to synthesise certain aspects of the English law of obligations or even to codify them. I point out that while some of these attempts have been successful, a number of others have created serious problems of their own. The conclusion is that before one tries to encapsulate the rules of English (or even European) law into ever more abstract propositions, these difficulties should be borne in mind and a degree of scepticism employed.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation[2002] 2 Web JCLIen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/16134en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWeb Journal of Current Legal Issuesen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2002/issue2/tettenborn2.htmlen_GB
dc.subjectobligations (law)en_GB
dc.subjectcodificationen_GB
dc.titleFrom chaos to cosmos - or is it confusion?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2008-01-15T16:09:51Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T11:52:51Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T16:55:16Z
dc.identifier.issn1360-1326en_GB
dc.identifier.journalWeb Journal of Current Legal Issuesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record