dc.contributor.author | Honeyball, Simon | en_GB |
dc.contributor.department | University of Exeter | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-03-05T12:38:48Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-01-25T11:52:42Z | en_GB |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-20T16:54:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | en_GB |
dc.description.abstract | The concept of 'employment' appears in various contexts in English law. However, the word 'employment' is defined in a variety of ways depending on which context is in point. This gives rise to the question as to whether there is a single, unified, concept of employment that is nevertheless characterised differently according to context, or whether a common term is used to cover a variety of differing concepts. The issue is an important one because the requirement or legitimacy of adopting cross-contextual, comparative, approaches is relevant to the development and interpretation of employment-related matters in several areas of law. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | [2005] 34 Cambrian Law Review 1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10036/19812 | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | University College of Wales, Department of Law | en_GB |
dc.subject | employment | en_GB |
dc.subject | law | en_GB |
dc.title | The Conceptual Integrity of Employment | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2008-03-05T12:38:48Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2011-01-25T11:52:42Z | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-20T16:54:26Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0084-8328 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Cambrian Law Review | en_GB |