Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoneyball, Simonen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-03-05T12:38:48Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T11:52:42Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T16:54:26Z
dc.date.issued2005en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe concept of 'employment' appears in various contexts in English law. However, the word 'employment' is defined in a variety of ways depending on which context is in point. This gives rise to the question as to whether there is a single, unified, concept of employment that is nevertheless characterised differently according to context, or whether a common term is used to cover a variety of differing concepts. The issue is an important one because the requirement or legitimacy of adopting cross-contextual, comparative, approaches is relevant to the development and interpretation of employment-related matters in several areas of law.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation[2005] 34 Cambrian Law Review 1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/19812en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity College of Wales, Department of Lawen_GB
dc.subjectemploymenten_GB
dc.subjectlawen_GB
dc.titleThe Conceptual Integrity of Employmenten_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2008-03-05T12:38:48Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T11:52:42Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T16:54:26Z
dc.identifier.issn0084-8328en_GB
dc.identifier.journalCambrian Law Reviewen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record