Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Todd R.en_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-29T15:43:34Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T10:25:57Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-19T15:51:05Z
dc.date.issued2006-02en_GB
dc.description.abstractWe show that it is sometimes efficient for a bank to commit to a policy that keeps information about its risky assets private. Our model, based upon Diamond-Dybvig (1983), has the feature that banks acquire information about their risky assets before depositors acquire it. A bank has the option of using contracts where the middle-period return on deposits is contingent on this information, but by doing so it must also reveal the information. We derive the conditions on depositors preferences and banking technology for which a bank would prefer to keep information secret even though it must then use a non-contingent deposit contract.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationEconomic Theory, February 2006 27, 341–357en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00199-004-0597-yen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/24456en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.springerlink.com/en_GB
dc.subjectDeposit contractsen_GB
dc.subjectInterim information.en_GB
dc.subjectBanksen_GB
dc.subjectConfidentialityen_GB
dc.titleWhy banks should keep secretsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2008-04-29T15:43:34Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T10:25:57Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-19T15:51:05Z
dc.identifier.issn0938-2259en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1432-0479
dc.identifier.journalEconomic Theoryen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record